Amnesty reports that Serbia is using spyware on journalists and activists, leading to protests for civil rights and transparency.
- Spyware monitored journalists and opposition activists.
- Large protests break out as public dissatisfaction increases.
Recently, Serbia has been in the news for a serious issue. There are claims that the state security is spying on journalists and opposition activists.
Amnesty International’s report is titled “A Digital Prison: Surveillance and the Suppression of Civil Society in Serbia.”
It shows a concerning fact. Spyware is being used on mobile phones to monitor people who disagree with the government.
Amnesty International’s Findings
The Amnesty report covers more than just the technical details of surveillance. It also includes troubling stories from people who have been impacted.
Serbian authorities have used invasive spyware to access personal devices without permission.
This spyware can take hidden screenshots, copy contact lists, and store sensitive data on government servers. This has reportedly happened during police detentions and interviews, showing a clear effort to silence dissent.
Government Response
In response to these claims, Serbian police firmly denied the allegations in the Amnesty report, calling it “absolutely incorrect.”
They said their forensic tools are common among police worldwide, suggesting their methods are standard, not oppressive.
The Security Information Agency (BIA) said it follows the law. They denied the accusations against them. Their response seemed defensive as more people began to question their actions.
Public Backlash and Protests
The report comes at a tough time for President Aleksandar Vucic, who faces a wave of civil unrest. A tragic building collapse in northern Serbia killed 15 people and sparked public anger.
Many people blame this disaster on corruption and carelessness by state officials. This has led to peaceful but strong protests by university students and opposition leaders.
International Implications
Serbia’s situation raises questions about both local unrest and its international ties. As Serbia seeks to join the European Union, its growing ties with Russia and China complicate its diplomatic position.
Foreign intelligence and NGOs are involved in the protests in Serbia. Because of this, Vucic has labeled these actions as “hybrid warfare.” He believes they are meant to destabilize his government.
The Role of Civil Society
Civil society groups like the Belgrade Center for Security Policy have played a key role in demanding accountability. They have criticized the misuse of digital surveillance.
They are asking for an independent investigation into the claims made by Amnesty International. Their statement emphasizes how important civil society is for protecting basic freedoms.
These freedoms include the rights to peaceful assembly, free speech, and association.
Conclusion
The revelations about Serbia’s surveillance practices remind us how fragile democracy and civil liberties can be in the face of growing authoritarianism.
As public anger rises, the need for transparent governance and respect for human rights becomes more urgent.
This situation requires immediate attention from both local leaders and the international community to ensure Serbia’s future aligns with democratic values.
Support for groups fighting for human rights and press freedoms in Serbia is crucial now. By raising awareness and getting involved, individuals can help create a movement for change. Together, we can strengthen democracy and ensure that every voice is heard.