The Dutch Court maintains weapons exports to Israel despite conflict

There are enough safeguards in place to prevent the transfer of weapons to Israel, according to the Dutch court, which rejected the effort to do so.

  • The court decides on matters of foreign policy, not judicial responsibility.
  • Activists are thinking about appealing the court’s judgment.

A Dutch court denied human rights organizations’ attempts to stop arms transfers to Israel and commerce with the occupied territories, citing sufficient safeguards to ensure compliance with international law.

Despite the continued war, the ten groups claimed that the Netherlands was breaking the 1948 Genocide Convention by selling arms to Israel.

Ahmad Abofoul, a legal advisor for the pro-Palestinian group Al-Haq, expressed his concern, claiming that the use of Dutch tax money had harmed his family and resulted in the deaths of 18 members.

An Israeli airstrike in the Nuseirat refugee camp struck a residential structure, killing at least 25 Palestinians and wounding scores more, exposing the ongoing violence.

Given that this is a political duty, the court made it clear that the interim relief judge does not have the authority to impose government policy.

Legal counsel for the government said that the court should not have the authority to decide matters of foreign policy.

Activist organizations have claimed that the Netherlands must cease arms sales in response to emergency directives issued by the International Court of Justice.

They emphasized that the UN court acknowledged the possibility of depriving Palestinians of rights guaranteed by the Genocide Convention. In light of the court’s decision, the coalition is thinking about filing an appeal.

The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants in November for Netanyahu, his former defense minister, and the military leader of Hamas.

The International Criminal Court issued the warrants on charges of crimes against humanity related to the thirteen-month conflict in Gaza.

Israeli authorities have refuted the claims, which include using famine as a weapon and deliberately targeting people.

The UN reports that the two-month blockage of humanitarian supplies to north Gaza has left tens of thousands of Palestinians without essentials.

The scenario here highlights the fact that the area is still experiencing a humanitarian catastrophe. In light of the ongoing war, the judgment of the Dutch court highlights the difficulty of juggling political and legal duties.

A Dutch court gives justice to a victim of Yazidi slavery around the world

A member of ISIS was found guilty of crimes against humanity in a landmark decision. This is a key moment in the pursuit of international human rights crimes.

  • The first case in the Netherlands to deal with crimes against the Yazidi people
  • The 10-year term shows that radical ideas are still a threat.

A Dutch court made a big choice when it found Hasna A. guilty of crimes against humanity and gave her a 10-year jail term for what she did in Syria with the Islamic State (IS) group.

The Yazidi community, a religious minority from northwest Iraq that experienced severe attacks from IS fighters in August 2014, is the subject of this sentence for the first time in the Netherlands.

During this brutal campaign, IS killed men and boys, forced women to become slaves, and forced them to convert to Islam or get married. As a result, about 300,000 Yazidis had to leave their home country.

Hasna A., a 33-year-old woman, took her 4-year-old son to Syria in 2015 and joined IS. There, she married a fighter. After that, she was given a Yazidi woman to work as her housekeeper, which unfortunately led to her being abused and mistreated regularly.

The Yazidi victim, who was only named Z., testified in court from a protected witness booth. She talked about how heartbreaking it was to be split from her son, who was taken to an IS battle camp. Hasna A. denied being responsible and said she lived a quiet life, but the court still found her guilty.

The judges gave her a 10-year sentence, which was longer than the eight years the prosecutors had originally suggested because she continued to express radical ideas.

Twelve women were sent back to the Netherlands from a Syrian refugee camp in 2022. Hasna A. has been in jail since she got back, and child protection services are now taking care of her children.

This finding is a big step forward in holding those responsible for the systematic mistreatment of the Yazidi people accountable. Additionally, it demonstrates how seriously the international community takes the issue of obtaining justice for those who have suffered due to extreme ideology and violence.

Exit mobile version